Once per year, all FWF members are evaluated in a Brand Performance Check (BPC). In the BPC, an independent auditor looks at how each member company is working on improvement in working conditions in the supply chain and whether the requirements of membership are met. Performance is measured by means of a variety of indicators. Based on the evaluation, a benchmarking scored is created that shows how the members rate in relations to different indicators. Depending on the length of membership, there are additional requirements for members. Combined with the Benchmarking Score, the results indicate the category that the member company has achieved. In addition, depending on the length of membership, a certain number of producers must undergo monitoring. More on monitoring at Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain
In 2015, 99% of VAUDE production facilities were undergoing monitoring. This is far beyond the requirements of the FWF. At the BPC 2015 , VAUDE achieved a Benchmarking Score of 94%. This excellent result once again put us into the Leader category. We significantly improved and expanded upon last year’s good performance and have underpinned our leader claim in the area of sustainability and social standards.
Performance Check | Leader | Good | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
First year |
- |
- |
- |
After 1st Check |
Score 75+ AND Monitoring 90 %+ |
Score 30 -74 AND Monitoring 40 %+ |
Score 0 -29 AND/OR Monitoring <40 % |
After 2nd Check |
Score 75+ AND Monitoring 90 %+ |
Score 40 -74 AND Monitoring 60 %+ |
Score 0 -39 AND/OR Monitoring <60 %* |
After 3rd Check |
Score 75+ AND Monitoring 90 %+ |
Score 50 -74 AND Monitoring 90 %+ |
Score 0-49 AND/OR Monitoring <90 %* |
Depending on the length of membership in the FWF, a certain percentage of the production facilities must be monitored.
99% of producers at VAUDE undergo monitoring. This is far above the requirements of the FWF.
In addition, the following issues are evaluated and rated:
The following table shows our results from the 2015 Brand Performance Check. It provides an overview of VAUDE’s points compared to the points possible.
The full Brand Performance Check report can be downloaded here.
Category | Earned | Possible |
---|---|---|
Purchasing Practices |
36 |
42 |
Monitoring and Remediation |
32 |
32 |
Complaints Handling |
14 |
15 |
Training and Capacity Building |
13 |
13 |
Information Management |
7 |
7 |
Transparency |
4 |
4 |
Evaluation |
2 |
2 |
Totals:
|
108
|
115
|
Benachmarking Score (Earned points divided by possible points) |
|
---|---|
94 |
|
Performance Benchmarking Category |
|
---|---|
Leader |
|
Despite our excellent results, there are two categories which need improvement:
This point will be intensively addressed in 2016 by the VAUDE Team in Tettnang and Asia to achieve improvements.
GRI: | G4-DMA Aspect of procurement |
GRI: | G4-LA14 |