DE
Search
Search Report
 
2014 Sustainability Report
published 2015/07/15

Strict controls in high-risk countries

If a supplier’s working conditions are not satisfactory, they must implement a Fair Wear Foundation action plan within three years.

Nine producers underwent initial audits

In 2014 we worked with 46 producers in high risk countries – the primarily non-European low wage paying countries of the textile industry. They make the majority of our products: 93 percent of our total expenditure for products goes to these facilities. The remaining seven percent of the total expenditure goes to eight producers in low risk countries.


The Fair Wear Foundation (FWF) distinguishes between low risk countries and high risk countries. Low risk countries are all EU Member States except Bulgaria, Romania and Switzerland. In accordance with FWF rules, only high risk countries must be audited, as there is a high risk of complaints with regard to labor practices and human rights there. In the long term, 90 percent of facilities in high risk countries must be audited, according to Fair Wear Foundation.


FWF Leader Status achieved in 2014

From the third year of membership, the Fair Wear Foundation expects that its members have audited and are monitoring 90 percent of companies in high risk countries. In 2014 we audited 89 percent of our producers in high risk countries and seven percent in low risk countries. Thus we arrive at a total score of 96 percent. The annual Brand Performance Check reviews also count in the overall assessment. We have met both requirements and in 2014 achieved Leader Status for the first time – the best category in the Fair Wear Foundation.




Leader Good Needs Improvement

1. Membership Year

x

x

x

After 1st Performance
Check

Score 75+
AND Monitoring 90%+

Score 30-74
AND Monitoring 40%+

Score 0-29
AND/OR Monitoring <40%

After 2nd Performance
Check

Score 75+
AND Monitoring 90%+

Score 40-74
AND Monitoring 60%+

Score 0-39
AND/OR Monitoring <60%

After 3rd Performance
Check

Score 75+
AND Monitoring 90%+

Score 50-74
AND Monitoring 90%+

Score 0-49
AND/OR Monitoring <90%

 
 

Audit Complaints

Of the VAUDE suppliers, 15 producers in high risk countries had their initial audit. Since the inspection criteria are very strict and extensive, there were complaints of varying degrees in all of our audits in high risk countries in 2014.


Overview of Complaints 2014

Production Facility: V15 V16 V14 V13 V11 V12 Overall Vietnam C12 C11 C10 C15 C16 C13 C14 Overall China T1 = Turkey M1 = Myanmar Overall

VAUDE purchasing practices

2

2

1

1

1

1

8

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

7

3

 

18

VAUDE monitoring system

 

 

 

1

1

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

2

 

4

Management system - producers

 

1

 

1

1

1

4

1

2

1

1

1

1

2

9

4

1

18

Communication

3

3

3

2

4

2

17

3

2

3

3

2

2

3

18

2

4

41

Forced Labor

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

0

Discrimination

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

2

2

Child Labor

 

 

1

1

1

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

0

Freedom of association/collective bargaining

2

1

 

1

1

 

5

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

7

 

1

13

Earned income

 

2

1

1

6

2

12

 

2

2

1

4

 

1

10

5

4

21

Working hours

1

1

3

2

3

2

12

3

 

2

1

4

1

3

14

 

3

29

Occupational health and safety

5

12

11

9

3

9

49

1

3

1

1

1

4

12

23

2

34

108

Legally binding employee relationship

1

1

2

 

3

1

8

1

1

 

 

 

1

1

4

1

2

15

Total:

14

23

22

19

24

19

121

11

12

11

9

14

11

24

92

19

51

283

Occupational health and safety and communication are the biggest problems

Most complaints were about workplace health and safety, as well as communication. Complaints related to working practices were present at every facility audited. On the subject of human rights, „freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining" were particularly objected to. This issue affected all audited facilities.


Action plan to improve working practices

After each audit, a Corrective Action Plan is created detailing the points and deficiencies to be addressed, and which ones need to be worked on in collaboration with the producers. The implementations of the individual points from the CAP are reviewed regularly with the help of our local VAUDE staff on site. In cases where difficulties in implementation are encountered, solutions are sought with the producers during meetings that take place annually.


Separation as the final step

This is sometimes a difficult process. But before we part from a producer, we try very hard to improve our collaboration. We work on issues of reliability, price policy and communication, as well as quality, environmental protection and social standards.

Only when we realize that our efforts to find a solution are failing, do we end the business relationship. In 2014, we ended our relationship with four producers due to poor working conditions and the negative attitude of the management.

Eight local suppliers

In addition, during the report year we have worked with eight producers in low risk countries which accounted for seven percent of the total spending for our products. Five percent is made solely by the production at VAUDE location Tettnang-Obereisenbach.

Producers in low risk countries have not been audited because there is little risk of adverse impacts in these countries. In an industry-wide comparison, these producers are relatively close to our main business site in Tettnang-Obereisenbach and are therefore referred to as local suppliers.

GRI:   LA14
percentage of new suppliers that were screened using labor practises criteria
GRI:   LA15
significant actual and potential negative impacts for labour practises in the supply chain and actions taken
GRI:   HR11
significant actual and potential negative human rights impacts in the supply chain and actions taken
GRI:   EC9
proportion of spending on local suppliers at significant location of operations
Related Stories
Contact